| |
Ethos Issue 7, Jan 2010
Enterprise Risk Management:
Strengthening Singapore’s Advantage
Ang Hak Seng
Good ERM measures can themselves become opportunities. For example, Singapore’s approach to managing its risks and vulnerabilities with respect to water supply has led to its being recognised as a world leader in water management and technology.
MAKING THE MOST OF ERM:
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
In order to fully exploit the value
proposition of ERM as a unifying platform
for strategic thinking, planning and
advantage, three guiding principles
are proposed:
1. Develop the common language of ERM
Effective dialogue is founded on a
common language. Although risk
management is a mature concept,
ERM has taken on several different
manifestations. To effectively work
across ministries and departments, we
need to decide on a common language
and a unified process. A forthcoming
manual created by the ERM workgroup
will provide the initial basis for just such
a common language for the Singapore
Public Service.
2. Link ERM with resource planning and
allocation and decide trade-offs at the
highest levels
In every resource planning and allocation
exercise, ERM should feature as a key
framework in management decisionmaking.
This will also link background
thinking and considerations to actual
policy and planning, in a coherent
manner that facilitates future thinking
and review.
3. Implement ERM through WOG groups,
but these groups should change periodically
Across ministries and departments,
there is no natural platform best suited
to considering the cross-cutting issues
raised by risk scanning or assessment.
Therefore, ERM groups need to be
deliberately formed for this task. Given
the diversity of issues and players,
there is no one correct way to organise
these groups. Nonetheless, to facilitate
work, some logical groupings will
need to be established. However, these
groupings should not be permanent,
to avoid hardening of perspectives or
bureaucratic constraints. One possible
option could be a central Risk Office to
coordinate efforts of different groups
and ensure alignment with strategic
WOG objectives.
CONCLUSION
The ability of ERM to raise issues that
cut across organisational boundaries
and unify by offering a common
platform for analysis and discussion
makes it a very useful framework for the
WOG strategic planning process, across
different levels of organisation and layers of uncertainty. ERM also focuses
attention on possible turbulent events:
offering a powerful strategic edge to
any country that has to navigate an ever
more unpredictable and complex world.
Singapore, with a nimble, integrated
and able Government, can seize this
initiative to position itself as a leading
country at the global forefront of coping
with Turbulence.
Senior Assistant Commissioner Ang Hak
Seng joined the Singapore Police Force in
1986 and has assumed leadership positions
in units involved in operations, intelligence
and frontline policing. He is the current Senior
Director of Planning and Development and
Director of International Cooperation. Senior
Assistant Commissioner Ang holds a M.Sc
(MOT) from the Massachusetts Institute
of Technology and attended the Advanced
Management Program at Harvard University.
He is also a chartered accountant by
training. He is leading a Civil Service project
team commissioned by the Organisational
Excellence Committee (OEC) on enterprise
risk management. The views expressed in
this article are his own.

| NOTES |
| 01. |
The four levels of uncertainty in Figure 1 are drawn from
"Strategy under Uncertainty" by Hugh G. Courtney, Jane
Kirkland and S. Patrick Viguerie, McKinsey Quarterly (June
2000). For the purposes of this article, we have aggregated
the risks into three classes: "Known Knowns", "Known
Unknowns" and "Unknown Unknowns". |
02.
|
Blue Ocean thinking, coined by W. Chan Kim and Renee
Mauborgne, refers to challenging the norm, moving out of
one’s comfort zone and exploring uncharted space so as to
spur creative and intellectual breakthroughs. |
IIII
5 |
|