| |
Ethos Issue 7, Jan 2010
Singapore: The Apple of Nations—
A Conversation with Peter Schwartz
Featuring
MR PETER SCHWARTZ, Futurist and cofounder of Global Business Network;
MS QUAH LEY HOON, former Director, National Population Secretariat, Prime Minister’s Office;
MR KWEK MEAN LUCK, Deputy Secretary (Industry), Ministry of Trade and Industry
(then Director, Industry Division)

One emerging issue we have
identified is the possibility of a sixties-style
youth revival in Asia that will
challenge the establishment. We see
signs of this in China and India. The
next generation in Singapore and in
Asia could turn out to be very rebellious
and progressively stranger.
QUAH: There are home-grown pockets of
creativity in Singapore, some of whom
have done well around the world. How
can we retain, nurture and develop
our own distinctive creative talent and
innovation, going forward?
SCHWARTZ: You already have the
scientists and the engineers, there’s no
question. The issue is whether you have
the next layer of marketing and design—
this is where creative culture and the
question of tolerance and diversity come
into play.
There is also a sense that Singapore
is still run with a corporate mentality:
top-down, not bottom-up and not highly
participatory. There is still energy at the
top, but there is a big thick middle that
has become conservative, bureaucratic
and risk averse, because all the incentives
are against rocking the boat. They play
by the rules and enforce the rules, and
make it hard for anyone at the bottom
to find their way or contribute. The high
quality of governance and an honest
system also means things sometimes get
slowed down. More people, more rules,
more density leads to the accumulation
of a dense fibre of constraint. At the same
time, because you have done well, you
now have a lot of talent and capability
looking for something to do and wanting
to make a difference, in a system that
already works extremely well. This is a
problem of success, not failure. Many big
companies have exactly the
same issues.
The challenge is to bring back some
of the bright young talent who see
exciting things happening around the
world, and do not have the patience to
plod through the bureaucracy for twenty
years to get things done. So you need to
open up the dense middle and give the
bottom, particularly young people, an
opportunity to participate.
One idea is to create a Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency
(DARPA)-like outfit to allow for
innovation outside the usual stream,
where you can experiment and be
allowed to fail, which is critical. Create
a mini ministry to conduct experiments
in governance: How would we run
things differently? How would we
organise things differently? If you
were to invent Singapore today, what would you do? How would you build
it? This could be used as a nucleus for
innovation elsewhere.
EDITOR: Does it make sense for Singapore
to sponsor something like the Ansari
X Prize,1 where we attract innovative
solutions to tricky problems? The ideas
may not come from us but they come
to us because we’re the ones who issue
the challenge.
SCHWARTZ: It’s a good idea and could
lead to something. I’m on the board of
the Auto X Prize and it’s a powerful
mechanism to stimulate creativity.
Another useful idea is the
MacArthur Fellows Program,2 which are
commonly called the Genius Awards.
Every year, a secret committee picks 20
to 30 talented individuals who exhibit
unusual creativity relatively early in
their career, although some are as late
as 50, and gives them US$100,000 a year
for five years, with no strings attached.
Over 800 Fellows have been named
since 1981; interestingly enough, there
is no common trend in terms of their
background or formative environment.
The impact of this award has been
disproportionately large, in terms
of its second order effect and on the
creative culture. Singapore could set
up something like this award for its
own citizens as a low-cost tool to draw
out talent.
The ETHOS Roundtable was hosted by Alvin Pang, Editor of ETHOS, in July 2009. Peter Schwartz was in Singapore for a monthlong sabbatical, during which he delivered a New Insights Lecture on "Emerging Strategic Issues and Wild Cards" at the Civil Service College and conducted a number of workshops for scenario planners in the Public Service.

| NOTES |
| 01. |
Twenty-six teams from seven countries competed for the
US$10 million Ansari X Prize, which in October 2004 was
awarded to aerospace designer Burt Rutan and financier
Paul Allen for building and launching a private spacecraft
capable of carrying three people to 100 kilometres above
the earth’s surface, twice within two weeks. Since then,
there has been more than US$1.5 billion dollars in public
and private expenditure in support of the private spaceflight
industry. See http://space.xprize.org/ansari-x-prize |
| 02. |
For more details, see http://www.macfound.org/fellows |
I |
|