CGL (Centre for Governance and Leadership) > Research & Publications > Ethos Perspectives > Making Work Pay  
     
     
 

Ethos Perspectives

Making Work Pay

Comment/Analysis
Increased labour force participation has been suggested as the best strategy for fighting poverty and increasing income equity. This is unlikely to be sufficient going forward. Poverty, as shown by current indicators, can be rampant even in high employment economies such the US and UK, than say in low employment economies like Belgium or the Germany. More work, by itself, does not guarantee less poverty. Adverse working conditions could in fact intensify the problems of low-wage households, by imposing increased work pressure, occupation-related health threats, and additional stressors on the family.

In this context, the experience from other countries suggests that wage supplementation can contribute to alleviating poverty, reducing inequality and promoting social inclusion. On top of encouraging people to take up jobs, it also helps improve job retention: the increased economic incentive to remain employed may not be the sole reason; greater income also helps workers meet family needs, tide over crises, and thus help to maintain long-term employment.

In the longer run, the financial wellbeing of households is associated with better educational and behavioural outcomes for children. Left unchecked, societies risk today’s inequality translating to tomorrow’s social immobility.

Making work pay is an essential part of Singapore’s progress in the age of globalisation. Singapore owes its success to a strong work ethic, a drive to constantly increase its productivity, and stable societal conditions. These factors have largely remained, and should be reinforced.

What has changed—and threatens to undermine the work incentive—is the employment landscape. Low wage competition from China, India and Latin America have depressed our wages; even with economic growth, the jobs created are mainly targeted at professionals, managers and executives; benefits trickle down slowly to the lower skilled. In this environment, lower skilled workers could work harder and longer, the unemployed could be co-opted into the labour force; but without education, it is difficult for them to earn much more. This problem, therefore, will remain in the short to mediumterm.

Going forward, downward wage pressures, as well as expanding social and economical needs, will lead to greater pressures on governments to spend more on social welfare. Wage supplementation is not a panacea, nor will it be cheap. However, it has been shown to help foster social inclusion, and also create economic opportunity for lower-income segments of the population. Such economic inclusion is a worthwhile pursuit. It is in line with our social values and meets our economic interests of increasing employment.

 

Prepared by
Andrew Kwok
Research Associate, Centre for Governance and Leadership, CSC

Shireen Lim
Senior Executive, Management Development, Institute of Policy Development, CSC

 

Page 1 I 2 I 3