CGL (Centre for Governance and Leadership) > Research & Publications > Ethos Perspectives > From the Periphery to the Centre: Engendering Social Inclusion  
     
     
 

Ethos Perspectives

From the Periphery to the Centre: Engendering Social Inclusion

Reference 4: "Overcoming Exclusion through Inclusive Approaches in Education: A Challenge & A Vision"
This paper highlights the potential inclusive character of education. Inclusive education refers to "an approach [which] seeks to address the learning needs of all children, youth and adults with a specific focus on those who are vulnerable to marginalisation and exclusion." Citing the International Commission on Education, the report reiterates the need for education policies to be diversified such that they address the needs of a diverse group of learners through increased participation in learning and reducing exclusion within cultures and communities.

Inclusive education demands that policymakers identify the characteristics of disadvantaged groups (e.g., in terms of income, ethnicity, religion, disability, etc.) which may curb access to education. Among children, social inequalities, lack of access to basic services and poverty are factors that place them at risk and contribute to learning breakdown and exclusion. Other barriers include: (a) problems in the provision and organisation of education, including inaccessibility due to distance, poor governance resulting in a lack of change, initiative and improvement, and inadequate curriculum; (b) prejudice and discrimination in the classroom; (c) the medium of instruction being different from the mother tongues of the children; and (d) inadequate capability building opportunities for the staff.

The author also highlights policies and structures that may reduce inclusiveness, such as a policy that defines who is "educable" and marginalises those who are not able to ‘make the mark’, thereby causing social exclusion. One area where this is commonly exhibited is in the education of people with disabilities. An inclusive education should also be relevant and flexible in its method of assessment, examination and evaluation, taking into account the needs of children and the everyday experiences of the learners. Inclusion can also be fostered by providing teacher training to marginalised groups such as ethnic minorities, the poor and the disabled so that these individuals can act as role models for others with the same experiences.

Booth, Tony, Overcoming Exclusion through Inclusive Approaches in Education: A Challenge & A Vision (Paris, France: UNESCO, 2003).

http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001347/134785e.pdf
(Accessed on 20 September 2007)

Comments/Analysis
Around the world, there is increasing urgency for governments to espouse social inclusion more aggressively so that fewer people are left behind in their countries’ development. Paid work is one of many strategies that has the potential of engendering social inclusion. In this respect, Singapore’s Workfare programme advances social inclusion as it helps to provide the poor—and their children—with adequate resources to cope with wage stagnation, and experience social mobility and social inclusion. Workfare is holistic in its approach as it offers help in other areas such as training, education and healthcare, at an affordable cost. One major apparatus for social inclusion is public housing, which has facilitated social integration across different income segments, unlike in other parts of the world where low-income individuals dominate certain residential areas.

Like Ireland, some countries have generated an action plan for social inclusion and spelled out how social inclusion objectives are mainstreamed into all areas—employment, education, housing and healthcare—and at different levels—government, non-profit organisations, private-sector bodies and other stakeholders. Others employ legal mechanisms, institutional frameworks and administrative structures to combat discrimination against the disadvantaged. It would be useful for Singapore policymakers to look at what else may need to be done to mainstream disadvantaged groups into policy and administrative frontiers to reduce social exclusion. Given that a person’s vulnerability to social exclusion varies with his life stage, policies and programmes should reach out to specific groups of disadvantaged rather than be all-encompassing, so that they have greater efficacy in the long run.

Prepared by:
Theresa W. Devasahayam, Senior Researcher, Centre for Governance and Leadership, Civil Service College
Karyn Choo, Senior Executive, Institute of Policy Development, Civil Service College

 

Page 1 I 2 I 3