CGL (Centre for Governance and Leadership) > Research & Publications > Ethos Perspectives > Nation Branding  
     
     
 

Ethos Perspectives

Nation Branding

Introduction
Although nations have always existed as brands, recently there has been an explosion in "nation-branding" — coordinated government efforts to manage a country's image, whether to improve tourism, investment or even foreign relations. New Zealand, Spain and Ireland are leading examples of the countries which have rebranded themselves successfully, partly by using techniques which major corporations have long employed.

However, branding a nation or a city is a far more complex task than selling detergent. One can argue that it requires more complex trade-offs and co-ordination than branding work for a product in the private sector. For example, no country begins with a clean slate: Each has to contend with its history and with perceptions already in existence. Nation branding also involves many, often unrelated and conflicting dimensions ranging from foreign policy to sports and the arts. It addresses multiple, diverse target audiences; and involves politics.

This issue explores some of the different types of branding — country, nation and destination branding — that are relevant to Singapore.

Reference 1: Introduction. Destination Branding: Creating the Unique Destination Proposition by Nigel Morgan et al
The key argument of this collection of essays is that "places offer the greatest untapped branding opportunities." Destination brands are beginning to reach beyond the tourism industry with countries like Singapore and New Zealand seeking to position themselves as holistic place brands. Key issues that successful destination branding must address are: the role of politics in crafting brands; the need for a long-term commitment to developing the brand; the need for ongoing and comprehensive market research in creating brands (Anholt notes that above all, it requires a sympathetic understanding of the consumers’ mindspace); the need for partnerships among stakeholders; and the value of brand champions.

Even successful nation brands must evolve and the most successful do so while remaining true to their brand’s essence. For instance, Spain and Singapore have woven new attributes into their original brand personalities. A new theme that has emerged since the 9/11 attacks is the importance of public and media relations, including crisis communications and specially designed PR to maximise the value of special events such as the Olympic Games.

Morgan, Nigel, Pritchard, Annette and Pride Roger. Introduction. Destination Branding: Creating the Unique Destination Proposition (Second Edition) (Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann: 2004).

http://books.elsevier.com/uk/hospitality/uk/subindex.asp?isbn=0750659696&
country=United+Kingdom&community=hospitality&ref=&mscssid=
Q3EW0R52K5729J6U02NS8PPUTBSQBRP9
(accessed 13 July, 2006)

Reference 2: How the World Sees the World: The Anholt Nation Brands Index (Fourth Quarter, 2005)
The Anholt Nation Brands Index now covers 35 countries including Singapore and evaluates their brands based on six areas: tourism, exports, governance, investment and immigration, culture and heritage, and people. This edition of the index includes a financial valuation of country-brands based on how much a country would have to pay to licence its brand if it did not own it. Singapore ranks 25 out of 32 countries ranked.

Anholt suggests that people consider countries as a whole and that therefore, it is good for countries to have rounded brand images with strength in as many dimensions as possible. Consistency is a key asset of a nation brand and Singapore ranks first in terms of all round-brand strength and consistency.

In the 2005 Q3 report, Anholt commented on the tendency of countries with powerful brands to rate their own nation brands highly as well, just as employees of a company need to ‘live the brand’ if the brand is to succeed. All top 15 nation brands rank themselves first, as do Ireland (17th in world rankings) and India (26th in world rankings). Singapore ranks itself 8th (23rd in world rankings). Malaysia ranks itself 4th (31st in world ranking).

The report also looks at how sports, education and science and technology as factors in nation branding. In this, Singapore ranks 17 out of 25 countries for science and technology. Finally, Japan is regarded as the most valued nation brand in eight developing countries, including Singapore.

 

Page 1 I 2