Civil Service College
Singapore Government  
Contact InfoFeedbackSitemapLinks  
Search
A Strategic Partner in Public Sector Learning & Organisational Excellence
A Strategic Partner in Public Sector Learning & Organisational Excellence
 
IPD (Institute of Policy Development)
IPD Home
About IPD
Milestone Programmes
Workshops & Seminars
Talks & Forums
Participant Login
Contact IPD
 
 
 
Print Friendly
Principles of Governance 


Preserving Our Fundamentals Preparing For The Future

Background

Over the years, Singapore has developed a good reputation for sound government. International rating agencies, such as IMD, Transparency International and PERC, have consistently given the Singapore Government high ratings for its efficiency, rule of law and lack of corruption.

Singapore's successful transformation from a small fishing village into a modern metropolis has attracted much international attention. Good governance has been a key factor. However, many will be surprised to learn that the Singapore Government does not follow a prescribed model of governance. Our system of governance is unique to our circumstances.

What is so unique about Singapore's governance context? We believe the principles are shaped by three key elements:

  1. Unique Nation: This relates to our physical constraints - our size, lack of natural resources, and a multi-racial society;
  2. Unique Environment: his relates to fundamental forces in our external environment that influence our existence; and
  3. Unique Government: This relates to the unique features of our political system, including the legacy of the PAP Government.

Together, these elements make us unique as a country to govern. However, each of these elements is not mutually exclusive but interacts with one another. For example, our physical constraints compel us to leverage on our external environment. Internal and external forces in turn, shape the role of our government.

From this context, four key tenets have been distilled as characteristics of our principles of governance. They are:

i. Leadership is Key


  • Eschew corruption
  • Do what is right, not what is popular
  • Be pragmatic
  • Provide long term vision


ii. Reward for Work; Work for Reward


  • Self-reliance, not welfare
  • Meritocracy for best use of talent


iii. A Stake for Everyone, Opportunities for All


  • Singapore a global city and choice home
  • Promote collective responsibility
  • Beyond physical stakes
  • Preserve core values and interests


iv. Anticipate Change; Stay Relevant


  • Stay nimble and flexible
  • Be better organised than competitors
  • Exploit opportunities even in adversity
  • Turn constraints into advantages




The overall framework can be illustrated as follows:




Leadership Is Key

Governance is more than just a set of institutional arrangements to ensure the effective functioning of society. Many countries have democratic elections, separation of powers and systems to hold their bureaucracies accountable to the legislature but they are not necessarily well governed. Effective systems of governance are necessary but the key is the quality of leadership that resides in all the institutions of governance. In fact, quality institutions of governance follow naturally from good leadership.

There are four core characteristics of leadership:

  • Eschew corruption: This is the most basic requirement but is often taken for granted. If Singapore's leaders fail to meet this necessary standard of probity, it cannot be demanded of any other official throughout the system. Indeed, the foundation of the public's trust in the Government stems from their belief that decisions are made without fear or favour. The actions and decisions of the Government must be fair, consistent, and transparent to all.


  • Do what is right, not what is popular: Our public sector leaders must have the courage to do what is necessary for the nation, rather than what is popular. Eschewing popularity does not mean ignoring the interests or preferences of the people. It does mean having the courage to confront difficult issues and take tough decisions, where necessary.

    Besides doing what is right, public sector leaders must also be prepared to take calculated risks and even go against conventional thought. Increasingly, Singapore will also find itself having to invent its own solutions as it expands into more and more unchartered fields of endeavour.


  • Be pragmatic: Our multi-racial context and external environment imposes various constraints on public policy. If we were to build all considerations into our policies, they would be almost impossible to implement. We must therefore be prepared to do what is practical. Being pragmatic also means we must be prepared to re-examine what we are doing from time to time and question whether the assumptions remain valid. Our public sector leaders must be prepared to go back to first principles and discard what is no longer valid. We must be "ruthless" in our honesty to admit what does not work and be ready to replace bad policies with good ones.


  • Provide long term vision: It is not enough for leaders to set high standards for themselves and to lead by example. Today, the task of government has become far too complex for a few people to manage from the top. The Civil Service as a whole needs to exercise good leadership at all levels of the organisation. Our people need to cope with adaptive change (i.e., fundamental changes in attitudes, mindsets and values).

    This calls for public sector leaders who can provide a long-term vision for Singapore, tempered by a sense of reality. They must be able to communicate their policies, convince the people of their rationale and eventually, bring them on board the change effort. They must be proactive agents of change.

 



Reward For Work; Work For Reward

Singapore has been governed on the basis that "no one owes us a living". We neither depend on others to provide us with assistance nor do we encourage our citizens to develop a dependent mindset. We believe that the strongest motivation for individuals and society to progress is for rewards to correspond directly with one's efforts. "Reward for Work; Work for Reward" therefore seeks to promote a positive work ethic and self-dependent mentality. It creates a powerful incentive for individuals to put in effort and reap the fruits of their efforts, rather than be free riders in our society.

This principle consists of two sub-principles:

  • Self-reliance, not welfare: Our limited resources prevent us from providing comprehensive state-funded welfare. An ageing population and a higher dependency ratio make this option even less feasible. Most importantly, such a system would sap away the incentive to work. We believe that every Singaporean should earn his own keep and strive for his own betterment. They should rely on their own abilities rather than depend on the Government for all their needs. The Government should only step in to help the genuinely needy with targeted assistance.

    Promoting self-reliance does not mean the Government frees itself of the responsibility of looking after the needs of its citizens. The Government will continue to provide basic and affordable public services, healthcare, housing, education and transport. In particular, the Government invests a significant amount of resources in education and skills training as it provides the best means of social mobility and ensures Singaporeans maintain their employability.


  • Meritocracy for best use of talent: We believe in the best person for the job - "best" being defined as one's own ability and performance, not one's race, religion, gender, wealth, social class, or connections. We believe in this for two reasons: First, the only way a small country like Singapore can do better than others is if it has the best people in leadership positions in politics, economy and society. Second, in our multi-racial society, any form of positive or negative discrimination against any race will ultimately create tension.

    We recognise that meritocracy is not a perfect solution to the inequalities that exist in our society, between individuals and racial groups. However, the solution is not to do away with meritocracy, but to find ways to level the playing field. The best ways are to invest in education, to create more opportunities in every field, and to enlarge the economic pie. These are all requisites for the concept to function smoothly in Singapore. That said, the concept of meritocracy itself has to be broadened to include non-academic achievements and embrace other "whole person" qualities.


 



A Stake For Everyone, Opportunities For All

All societies seek to create a stake for their citizens but in Singapore's case, it is all the more important because of our origins as an immigrant society. Singapore can only survive if every Singaporean sees their future and that of their fellow countrymen as intertwined. Giving a stake to everyone, not just citizens but all who have a role to play in Singapore's future will help towards this end.

The Government will create opportunities for Singaporeans, regardless of their abilities, to realise their full potential. It will not only develop Singapore as a land of opportunity, but also diverse opportunities. It will create more avenues for Singaporeans to pursue their interests in fields that contribute to Singapore's development as a vibrant and balanced society e.g. sports, arts and culture. However, while ensuring ample opportunities for everyone, the Government cannot, nor should it guarantee equal outcomes.

The sub-principles in this case are:

  • Make Singapore a global city and choice home: Singaporeans will only make the sacrifices required of them if they have a stake in the country and are proud to be Singaporean. We have to ensure that Singapore continues to be a choice location to work and raise a family. This means maintaining our premium on security, stability and social cohesion. It also means ensuring that our living environment continues to be attractive and the public has easy access to good yet affordable public services and facilities.

    Besides catering to our citizens, Singapore's continued success depends on its openness to newcomers, who can contribute to Singapore's development. They should be given a stake, although the nature of this stake will naturally be different from our citizens. In order to be a great city, we cannot afford to be so narrow as to only focus on privileges for today's Singaporeans. Today's newcomers may become tomorrow's Singaporeans.

    Just as Singaporeans now look beyond their basic needs, so too will foreign investors and talent as they decide where they want to base themselves. The competition for talent has become global. This requires us to pay attention to the softer aspects of our infrastructure, such as lifestyle, the arts, and culture.


  • Promote collective responsibility: No society can progress without those who have benefited from the system putting something back into society. Self-reliance must therefore be balanced with collective responsibility. Collective responsibility can take different forms. For example, certain initiatives benefiting society as a whole need not be undertaken solely by the Government but only through co-sponsorship. The underlying premise is that a robust society and economy should never have to depend only on the Government's support. The other example is the 'Many Helping Hands' approach, bringing into play family support, community support, and as a last line of defence, government support, for the needy.


  • Beyond physical stakes: As part of the nation-building effort, the Government has given everyone a tangible stake in the country through its home ownership scheme, and later, through its various asset enhancement schemes. With most Singaporeans now owning their own homes and becoming more affluent, home ownership and asset enhancement will not have the same impact as before.

    Our efforts must go beyond physical stakes. We need to find ways of rooting Singaporeans emotionally. One way is to create more opportunities for citizens to participate in the decision-making process and to provide feedback on various policies. Another is for the Government to support worthwhile causes that may yield high social, rather than economic spinoffs or in the way we assess what is "good" for our society e.g. in our conservation of historical places. Traditional cost-benefit analysis should perhaps give greater weightage to the "emotional value". A third way is for the Government to shift away from pure economic logic in the way it communicates some of its policies.

    Our focus should also encompass Singaporeans overseas. This group is likely to grow in size, as we become more globalised. We will need to find new ways of rooting them emotionally to Singapore (we are already organising overseas activities for them, maintaining links through overseas networks such as the Majulah Connection and allowing overseas voting).

  • Preserve core values and identity: Perhaps the most fundamental stake we can give Singaporeans is the idea of Singapore's uniqueness. Few city-states have thrived with such success as we have in today's world.

We should not forget that in 1965, independence was thrust upon us, because of our pursuit of a vision of a society based on equality, regardless of race, language or religion. This ideal must continue to be nurtured in the hearts of every Singaporeans and experienced in the reality of Singapore society. Ultimately, the strength of our will to safeguard our fundamental rights as a sovereign nation - our right to self-determination, our right to establish ties with anyone, and our right to live and work the way we do - depends on a shared destiny.

 



Anticipate Change, Stay Relevant

This principle encapsulates our basic approach to dealing with our dynamic external environment. While we cannot forecast change in an increasingly volatile environment, we can anticipate it by staying nimble and flexible, and at the same time, exploiting opportunities that come our way. We seek to:

  • Turn constraints into advantages: Singapore's constraints have compelled us to seek ingenious solutions to our problems. For example, we turned poor regional conditions into an advantage by offering First World conditions in a Third World region. We also turned our small size into an advantage, by better utilising resources and minimising wastage. Our effort to make ourselves self-sufficient in our water supplies is a case in point. And what we lacked in quantity, we made up in quality while ensuring we remained competitive. In this way, we were able to develop, for example, PSA and SIA into world class companies, which could take on the more established players.

  • Be better organised than our competitors: We have always had to distinguish ourselves from the region. But today, the region is rapidly catching up and our competitors have become better organised than before. This is to be expected. However, we have several decades' head-start. We will have to be even better organised than our competitors in the following ways:

    1. Closer coordination and integration - With the devolution of government functions and setting up of more statutory agencies with greater autonomy, government agencies will need to work even more closely in order to reconcile their competing priorities and identify a solution that best serves the national interest;
    2. Better teamwork & organisation - Besides the Government, our people need to develop group instincts to work as a team, even as individual initiative, creativity and enterprise are encouraged;
    3. Benchmark against the best - We should continue to benchmark ourselves against the best in government or industry, in order to maintain our edge. Where benchmarks are lacking, we should keep in close touch with shakers and movers in government and business to ensure that we are clued in to the latest developments.
    4. Strategic leverage on technology - The Singapore Government has been an early adopter of technology, especially IT, since the early 80s. Technology is a force multiplier that will help maintain Singapore's competitive edge across all fields. The Civil Service should continue to be an early adopter and leverage on technology to improve the overall responsiveness of our public agencies and better delivery of public services. This will ensure that the Singapore Civil Service maintains it edge over others.

  • Stay nimble and flexible: In a rapidly changing world, Singapore needs to continually find new ways of staying relevant. To achieve this, we must be able to exploit opportunities faster than our competitors. This will become more important as change becomes more frequent and discontinuous. Our society must be adaptable to change. The Government also has a crucial role to play - as catalyst and champion of change:

    1. First, it has to be more receptive to new ideas. It needs to recognise that it has some blind spots, prejudices and historical baggage that need to be jettisoned. It should be bolder in supporting private initiatives, either by sanctioning them or co-initiating them.
    2. Second, instead of picking "winners" in any field in the New Economy, the Government should identify a broad range of capabilities that can be developed into future competitive strengths. This will maximise our options in the future.

      Flexibility does not mean we compromise on our beliefs and interests. Where our conduct of international relations is concerned, we should do so on the basis of mutual respect and benefit. Standing up for our rights preserves the international space that we have painstakingly built up for ourselves over the years and our freedom for manoeuvre.

  •  Exploit opportunities even in adversity: Opportunities do not only present themselves when times are good. While we anticipate and plan for the worst-case scenario, we should also be continually on the lookout for opportunities in times of crisis and find ways to turn them to our advantage.

We should always be on the look out for any tensions arising between the principles. The dilemmas that result do not necessarily negate the policy direction being considered but rather it indicates that the eventual policy solution will need to be customised to that unique context or set of circumstances. In a rapidly changing environment, there is an increasing need for government to be able to generate such solutions to meet a wide variety of scenarios. It is in resolving these tensions that the principles move from the realm of theory to the real world of policy implementation.

 
 
 
 
 
  Best viewed using IE 5.5+ or Netscape 7.0+, under 800 x 600 resolution